Comparison

Burkānu Salāti Karolīnas vs Karotten Salat BioBio

Overall, Burkānu Salāti Karolīnas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBurkānu Salāti KarolīnasKarotten Salat BioBio
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 60 kcal 62 kcal
Fat 1.9 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.1 g
Sugars 9.5 g 11.5 g
Salt 1 g 1 g
Fiber 20.2 g 1.9 g
Protein 0.7 g 0.7 g
Additives30
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Karotten Salat BioBio has 89% less fat (0.2 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Burkānu Salāti Karolīnas has 17% less sugar (9.5 g vs 11.5 g).
  • Burkānu Salāti Karolīnas has 91% more fiber (20.2 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Burkānu Salāti Karolīnas has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Karotten Salat BioBio is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Burkānu Salāti Karolīnas

Burkāni 84%, mērce(cukurs, üdens, ābolu etikis, rapšu ella, SINEPJU pulveris 4,1%, sāls, ķiploku pulveris, beta karotīns, OLU dzeltuma pulveris,vorčesteras mērce (vina etikis, iesala etiķis (no MIEŽIEM), cukurs, sāls, karamelizēts cukura sirups. garšvielas (satur SELERIJU), citronella) ). tomātu pasta, kartupeļu skiedras, paprikas. pārslas, tomato pulveris, baltie pipari, stabilizētājs - guara un ksantāna sveķi, konservants kālija sorbāts), pētersili, sāls

Karotten Salat BioBio

Bio Karotten, Bio Branntweinessig, Bio Zucker, Meersalz.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Burkānu Salāti Karolīnas or Karotten Salat BioBio?

Overall, Burkānu Salāti Karolīnas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Burkānu Salāti Karolīnas has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 62 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Burkānu Salāti Karolīnas has less sugar: 9.5 g versus 11.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons