Comparison

Burger salmone vs Fish burger salmone bio

Overall, Burger salmone has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBurger salmoneFish burger salmone bio
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group — —
Calories 134 kcal 174 kcal
Fat 6.8 g 8.6 g
Saturated fat 1 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.9 g
Protein 18 g 15.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Burger salmone has 23% fewer calories (134 kcal vs 174 kcal).
  • Burger salmone has 21% less fat (6.8 g vs 8.6 g).
  • Burger salmone has 23% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Burger salmone has no sugar, while Fish burger salmone bio has 0.5 g.
  • Burger salmone has 12% more protein (18 g vs 15.8 g).
  • Burger salmone has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Burger salmone

Not available.

Fish burger salmone bio

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Burger salmone or Fish burger salmone bio?

Overall, Burger salmone has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Burger salmone has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 174 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Burger salmone has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons