Burger salmone vs Burger salmone
Overall, Burger salmone has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Burger salmone | Burger salmone |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 172 kcal | 134 kcal |
| Fat | 9.1 g | 6.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 21 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Burger salmone has 22% fewer calories (134 kcal vs 172 kcal).
- Burger salmone has 25% less fat (6.8 g vs 9.1 g).
- Burger salmone has 23% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Burger salmone has 39% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Burger salmone has 14% more protein (21 g vs 18 g).
Ingredients
Burger salmone
Not available.
Burger salmone
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Burger salmone or Burger salmone?
Overall, Burger salmone has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Burger salmone has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 172 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Burger salmone has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.