Comparison

Bruschetta Tomatenaufstrich würzig vs Bruschetta

Overall, Bruschetta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBruschetta Tomatenaufstrich...Bruschetta
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 84 kcal 315 kcal
Fat 5.3 g 26 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0 g
Sugars 6 g 0 g
Salt 2.2 g 2 g
Fiber 1 g 1.3 g
Protein 1.2 g 4.1 g
Additives30
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bruschetta Tomatenaufstrich würzig has 73% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 315 kcal).
  • Bruschetta Tomatenaufstrich würzig has 80% less fat (5.3 g vs 26 g).
  • Bruschetta has no saturated fat, while Bruschetta Tomatenaufstrich würzig has 0.6 g.
  • Bruschetta has no sugar, while Bruschetta Tomatenaufstrich würzig has 6 g.
  • Bruschetta has 71% more protein (4.1 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Bruschetta is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Bruschetta Tomatenaufstrich würzig

79% Tomaten, Balsamessig (Weißweinessig, Traubenmostkonzentrat), Rapsöl, natives Olivenöl extra, Zucker, Kräuter, Speisesalz, Zwiebeln, Knoblauch, Tomatenpulver, Tomatenmark doppelt konzentriert, Paprikaextrakt, Gewürze, Verdickungsmittel: Xanthan; Farbstoff: Paprikaextrakt; Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure; Säureregulator: Natriumacetate.

Bruschetta

tomates séchées 64% (ltalie), huile d'olive vierge extra (Italie), eau, sel de cuisine, ail, origan, vinaigre de vin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bruschetta Tomatenaufstrich würzig or Bruschetta?

Overall, Bruschetta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bruschetta Tomatenaufstrich würzig has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 315 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bruschetta has less sugar: 0 g versus 6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons