Bruschetta Tomate séchée vs Bruschetta Klassik
Overall, Bruschetta Klassik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bruschetta Tomate séchée | Bruschetta Klassik |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 271 kcal | 72 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 3.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 5.8 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 6.4 g | — |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bruschetta Klassik has 73% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 271 kcal).
- Bruschetta Klassik has 88% less fat (3.1 g vs 25 g).
- Bruschetta Klassik has 91% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 4.4 g).
- Bruschetta Tomate séchée has 53% less sugar (2.7 g vs 5.8 g).
- Bruschetta Klassik has 61% less salt (1.1 g vs 2.8 g).
- Bruschetta Klassik has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bruschetta Tomate séchée
Tomates séchées* (tomates*, sel) 72%, huile d'olive vierge extra, huile de tournesol*, sel, vinaigre de vin*. *Produits issus de l'agriculture biologique.
Bruschetta Klassik
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bruschetta Tomate séchée or Bruschetta Klassik?
Overall, Bruschetta Klassik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bruschetta Klassik has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 271 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bruschetta Tomate séchée has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 5.8 g per 100 g.