Brousse au lait pasteurise PIERRUCCI, 13.5%MG vs Brousse de brebis
Overall, Brousse au lait pasteurise PIERRUCCI, 13.5%MG has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Brousse au lait pasteurise PIERRUCCI, 13.5%MG
Brousse de brebis
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Brousse au lait pasteurise P... | Brousse de brebis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 148 kcal | 175 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 7 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Brousse au lait pasteurise PIERRUCCI, 13.5%MG has 15% fewer calories (148 kcal vs 175 kcal).
- Brousse au lait pasteurise PIERRUCCI, 13.5%MG has 30% less saturated fat (7 g vs 10 g).
- Brousse au lait pasteurise PIERRUCCI, 13.5%MG has 43% less sugar (2 g vs 3.5 g).
- Brousse de brebis has 79% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Brousse de brebis has 20% more protein (10 g vs 8 g).
- Brousse au lait pasteurise PIERRUCCI, 13.5%MG is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Brousse au lait pasteurise PIERRUCCI, 13.5%MG
Lactosérum de brebis, Lait pasteurisé de brebis origine France, sel.
Brousse de brebis
_Lactosérum_ et _Lait_ de brebis pasteurisés, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Brousse au lait pasteurise PIERRUCCI, 13.5%MG or Brousse de brebis?
Overall, Brousse au lait pasteurise PIERRUCCI, 13.5%MG has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Brousse au lait pasteurise PIERRUCCI, 13.5%MG has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Brousse au lait pasteurise PIERRUCCI, 13.5%MG has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.