Comparison

Brödli (Weizenkleingebäck) vs Madras Plain Poppadums

Overall, Madras Plain Poppadums has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBrödli (Weizenkleingebäck)Madras Plain Poppadums
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 370 kcal 319 kcal
Fat 3 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.1 g
Sugars 5.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.1 g 5 g
Protein 13 g 25 g
Additives12
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Madras Plain Poppadums has 14% fewer calories (319 kcal vs 370 kcal).
  • Madras Plain Poppadums has 83% less fat (0.5 g vs 3 g).
  • Madras Plain Poppadums has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Madras Plain Poppadums has 90% less sugar (0.5 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Brödli (Weizenkleingebäck) has 78% less salt (1.1 g vs 5 g).
  • Madras Plain Poppadums has 48% more protein (25 g vs 13 g).
  • Brödli (Weizenkleingebäck) has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Brödli (Weizenkleingebäck) is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Brödli (Weizenkleingebäck) lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Brödli (Weizenkleingebäck)

Weizenkleingebāck mit weizenvollkornmehl, Geröstet: Weizenvollkornmehl, Weizenmehl, Zucker, Hefe, Sonnenblumenöl, Jodiertes speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Mehlbehandlungsmittel: Ascorbinsäure: Kümmel

Madras Plain Poppadums

Urdbohnenmehl., Salz, Reismehl, Kokosnussöl, Säureregulator: Calciumcarbonat.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Brödli (Weizenkleingebäck) or Madras Plain Poppadums?

Overall, Madras Plain Poppadums has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Madras Plain Poppadums has fewer calories: 319 kcal versus 370 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Madras Plain Poppadums has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons