Bouillon de viande vs Beef Stock cubes x
Overall, Bouillon de viande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bouillon de viande | Beef Stock cubes x |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 4 kcal | 70 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 9.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery, Gluten, Soybeans | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bouillon de viande has 94% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 70 kcal).
- Bouillon de viande has 90% less fat (0.5 g vs 5 g).
- Bouillon de viande has no saturated fat, while Beef Stock cubes x has 3 g.
- Bouillon de viande has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Bouillon de viande has 89% less salt (1.1 g vs 9.8 g).
- Beef Stock cubes x has 50% more protein (1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Bouillon de viande lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Bouillon de viande
Sel, amidon, maltodextrine, sirop de glucose, extraitde levure, 3 % graisse de boeuf, 2,3 % extrait de viande de boeuf, sucre, sirop decaramel, arômes, 0,6 % carottes, oignons, épices (CÉLERI), persil.
Beef Stock cubes x
salt, vegetable fats (palm, shea butter, sal butter), potato starch, sugar, beef extract (4%), yeast extract, flavourings, onion powder, caramel syrup, maltodextrin, parsley, carrots, spices (parsley roots, celery seeds),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bouillon de viande or Beef Stock cubes x?
Overall, Bouillon de viande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bouillon de viande has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 70 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bouillon de viande has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.