Comparison

Bouillon de viande vs Bouillon pour viande

Overall, Bouillon de viande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBouillon de viandeBouillon pour viande
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 4 kcal 262 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 12 g
Saturated fat 0 g 8.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 5.9 g
Salt 1.1 g 43.7 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.5 g 14 g
Additives00
AllergensCelery, Gluten, SoybeansGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bouillon de viande has 98% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 262 kcal).
  • Bouillon de viande has 96% less fat (0.5 g vs 12 g).
  • Bouillon de viande has no saturated fat, while Bouillon pour viande has 8.5 g.
  • Bouillon de viande has 92% less sugar (0.5 g vs 5.9 g).
  • Bouillon de viande has 97% less salt (1.1 g vs 43.7 g).
  • Bouillon pour viande has 96% more protein (14 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Bouillon pour viande is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Bouillon de viande lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Bouillon de viande

Sel, amidon, maltodextrine, sirop de glucose, extraitde levure, 3 % graisse de boeuf, 2,3 % extrait de viande de boeuf, sucre, sirop decaramel, arômes, 0,6 % carottes, oignons, épices (CÉLERI), persil.

Bouillon pour viande

Sel, exhausteur de sucre, extrait de levure, viande de bœuf en poudre 1%, persil 0,3%, carotte' 0,3% soja (graine de SOJA, BLE)), jus d'oignon concentré', huile de tournesol, Peut cont c OF

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bouillon de viande or Bouillon pour viande?

Overall, Bouillon de viande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bouillon de viande has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 262 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bouillon de viande has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 5.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons