Boudins blancs à la truffe 1,1% vs Weißwurst
Overall, Weißwurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Boudins blancs à la truffe 1,1%
Weißwurst
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Boudins blancs à la truffe 1... | Weißwurst |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 259 kcal | 273 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.4 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 9 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Weißwurst has 67% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Weißwurst has 18% more protein (11 g vs 9 g).
- Only Boudins blancs à la truffe 1,1% lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Boudins blancs à la truffe 1,1%
28 % viande de porc (origine : UE), _lait_ frais demi-écrémé pasteurisé, eau, gras de porc (origine : UE), 15 % viande de dinde (origine : UE), amidon de maïs, apéritif à base de vin, sel, 1,1 % brisures de truffes (Tuber aestivum Vitt,), arômes, amidon modifié de pomme de terre, protéines de _lait_, poivre, plantes aromatiques, boyau naturel de porc,
Weißwurst
Schweinefleisch 75%, Speck, Trinkwasser, gekochte Schwarten, Petersilie, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte, Zitronenäl, Dextrose, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Schweinesaitling.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Boudins blancs à la truffe 1,1% or Weißwurst?
Overall, Weißwurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Boudins blancs à la truffe 1,1% has fewer calories: 259 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Weißwurst has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.