Comparison
Blomkål vs Obalovaný květák
Overall, Blomkål has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Blomkål | Obalovaný květák |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 20 kcal | 156 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 8.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | — |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blomkål has 87% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 156 kcal).
- Blomkål has no fat, while Obalovaný květák has 8.2 g.
- Blomkål has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Blomkål has 65% less sugar (1.1 g vs 3.1 g).
- Blomkål has 86% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Obalovaný květák has 56% more protein (2.7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Blomkål is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Obalovaný květák lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Blomkål
Förvällda blomkålsbuketter.
Obalovaný květák
Květák min. 70 %, strouhanka (pšeničná mouka, voda, jedlá sůl, droždí), řepkový olej, jedlá sůl.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Blomkål or Obalovaný květák?
Overall, Blomkål has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blomkål has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 156 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blomkål has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Organic Riced Cauliflowe... vs Obalovaný květák
Organic Riced Cauliflowe... vs Blomkål
Riced Cauliflower vs Obalovaný květák
Riced Cauliflower vs Blomkål
Organic Riced Cauliflowe... vs Obalovaný květák
Organic Riced Cauliflowe... vs Blomkål
Riced Veggies Cauliflowe... vs Obalovaný květák
Riced Veggies Cauliflowe... vs Blomkål