Blé précuit cuisson rapide étui de 400g vs Blé
Overall, Blé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Blé précuit cuisson rapide é... | Blé |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 347 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.6 g | 10 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Blé dur précuit |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blé précuit cuisson rapide étui de 400g has 52% less fat (1.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Blé précuit cuisson rapide étui de 400g has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Blé has 57% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.4 g).
- Blé has 44% more fiber (10 g vs 5.6 g).
- Blé has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
- Blé has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Blé lists: Blé dur précuit.
Ingredients
Blé précuit cuisson rapide étui de 400g
100% BLE dur precuit. traces eventuelles de soja
Blé
Peut contenir des traces de soja, de sésame et de moutarde.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Blé précuit cuisson rapide étui de 400g or Blé?
Overall, Blé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blé has fewer calories: 347 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blé has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.