Bitter monster imper vs Basilico
Overall, Basilico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bitter monster imper | Basilico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 107 kcal | 64 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 5.9 g |
| Salt | 3.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Basilico has 40% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 107 kcal).
- Basilico has 63% less fat (2.6 g vs 7 g).
- Bitter monster imper has 83% less sugar (1 g vs 5.9 g).
- Basilico has 76% less salt (0.9 g vs 3.7 g).
- Basilico has 83% more fiber (1.9 g vs 0.3 g).
- Bitter monster imper has 73% more protein (5.9 g vs 1.6 g).
- Basilico has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bitter monster imper is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Bitter monster imper lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Bitter monster imper
water, mustard seeds, alcohol vinegar, sea salt
Basilico
Pulpe de tomates 72%, concentré de tomates 14%, oignons, huile de tournesol, basilic 2%, sucre, sel, arôme naturel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bitter monster imper or Basilico?
Overall, Basilico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Basilico has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 107 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bitter monster imper has less sugar: 1 g versus 5.9 g per 100 g.