Bio Rinder Rumpsteak vs Chicken Nuggets
Overall, Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Rinder Rumpsteak | Chicken Nuggets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 129 kcal | 222 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 13.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 12.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery, Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has 42% fewer calories (129 kcal vs 222 kcal).
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has 62% less fat (5 g vs 13.2 g).
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has no sugar, while Chicken Nuggets has 0.8 g.
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has no salt, while Chicken Nuggets has 1 g.
- Chicken Nuggets has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has 39% more protein (21 g vs 12.9 g).
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Chicken Nuggets lists: Celery, Eggs, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Bio Rinder Rumpsteak
Rindfleisch
Chicken Nuggets
51% Hähnchenfleisch, Trinkwasser, WEIZENMEHL, Paniermehl (enthält WEIZEN), Rapsöl, Maismehl, Speisesalz, Stärke, Zucker, Gewürze, Dextrose, Aroma, Gewürzextrakt (SELLERIE). Kann Spuren enthalten von: Ei, Milch und Soja
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Rinder Rumpsteak or Chicken Nuggets?
Overall, Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has fewer calories: 129 kcal versus 222 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.