Comparison

Bio Rinder Rumpsteak vs Hänchen Geschnetzeltes Gyros-Art

Overall, Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBio Rinder RumpsteakHänchen Geschnetzeltes Gyros...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 129 kcal 159 kcal
Fat 5 g 7.9 g
Saturated fat 2 g 1.9 g
Sugars 0 g 0.3 g
Salt 0 g 1.3 g
Fiber 0 g 0.2 g
Protein 21 g 21.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has 19% fewer calories (129 kcal vs 159 kcal).
  • Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has 37% less fat (5 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has no sugar, while Hänchen Geschnetzeltes Gyros-Art has 0.3 g.
  • Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has no salt, while Hänchen Geschnetzeltes Gyros-Art has 1.3 g.
  • Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Bio Rinder Rumpsteak is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Bio Rinder Rumpsteak

Rindfleisch

Hänchen Geschnetzeltes Gyros-Art

Hähnchenfleisch 98 %, Speisesalz, Gewürze, Kräuter, Rohrohrzucker, Gewürzextrakt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio Rinder Rumpsteak or Hänchen Geschnetzeltes Gyros-Art?

Overall, Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has fewer calories: 129 kcal versus 159 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons