Bio Rinder Rumpsteak vs Hänchen Geschnetzeltes Gyros-Art
Overall, Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Rinder Rumpsteak | Hänchen Geschnetzeltes Gyros... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 129 kcal | 159 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 7.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 21.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has 19% fewer calories (129 kcal vs 159 kcal).
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has 37% less fat (5 g vs 7.9 g).
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has no sugar, while Hänchen Geschnetzeltes Gyros-Art has 0.3 g.
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has no salt, while Hänchen Geschnetzeltes Gyros-Art has 1.3 g.
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bio Rinder Rumpsteak is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Bio Rinder Rumpsteak
Rindfleisch
Hänchen Geschnetzeltes Gyros-Art
Hähnchenfleisch 98 %, Speisesalz, Gewürze, Kräuter, Rohrohrzucker, Gewürzextrakt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Rinder Rumpsteak or Hänchen Geschnetzeltes Gyros-Art?
Overall, Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has fewer calories: 129 kcal versus 159 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Rinder Rumpsteak has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.