Comparison

Bio-Puten Bierschinken vs Salchichon de dinde extra halal

Overall, Bio-Puten Bierschinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBio-Puten BierschinkenSalchichon de dinde extra ha...
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 184 kcal 312 kcal
Fat 14 g 22 g
Saturated fat 4.2 g 7.9 g
Sugars 0.3 g 1.8 g
Salt 2 g 4.7 g
Protein 15 g 26.1 g
Additives010
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio-Puten Bierschinken has 41% fewer calories (184 kcal vs 312 kcal).
  • Bio-Puten Bierschinken has 36% less fat (14 g vs 22 g).
  • Bio-Puten Bierschinken has 47% less saturated fat (4.2 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Bio-Puten Bierschinken has 83% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Bio-Puten Bierschinken has 57% less salt (2 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Salchichon de dinde extra halal has 43% more protein (26.1 g vs 15 g).
  • Bio-Puten Bierschinken has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Salchichon de dinde extra halal lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Bio-Puten Bierschinken

Not available.

Salchichon de dinde extra halal

viande de dinde (130g pour 100g de produit), graisse de canard, sel, _LACTOSE_, dextrose, protéines de _LAIT_, dextrine, antioxydant (E-331 et E-301), émulsifiant (E-452), épices, exhausteur de goût (E-621), conservateurs (E-250 et E-252) colorant naturel rouge de betterave et arôme. Traitement de surface (E-202 et E-235).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio-Puten Bierschinken or Salchichon de dinde extra halal?

Overall, Bio-Puten Bierschinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio-Puten Bierschinken has fewer calories: 184 kcal versus 312 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio-Puten Bierschinken has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons