Bio Cramberries séchées et sucrées vs Cashew Cranberry mix
Overall, Cashew Cranberry mix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Cramberries séchées et s... | Cashew Cranberry mix |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 332 kcal | 500 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 65 g | 29 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 4.3 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Cramberries séchées et sucrées has 34% fewer calories (332 kcal vs 500 kcal).
- Bio Cramberries séchées et sucrées has 95% less fat (1.4 g vs 30 g).
- Bio Cramberries séchées et sucrées has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 5 g).
- Cashew Cranberry mix has 55% less sugar (29 g vs 65 g).
- Cashew Cranberry mix has 99% more protein (13 g vs 0.1 g).
- Cashew Cranberry mix has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bio Cramberries séchées et sucrées
Not available.
Cashew Cranberry mix
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Cramberries séchées et sucrées or Cashew Cranberry mix?
Overall, Cashew Cranberry mix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Cramberries séchées et sucrées has fewer calories: 332 kcal versus 500 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cashew Cranberry mix has less sugar: 29 g versus 65 g per 100 g.