Comparison

Bio Choconoa vs Tomate frito bio

Overall, Tomate frito bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBio ChoconoaTomate frito bio
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group — —
Calories 508 kcal 80 kcal
Fat 27 g 4 g
Saturated fat 16 g 0 g
Sugars 26 g 5 g
Salt 0.5 g 1 g
Fiber 5.3 g —
Protein 6.3 g 0.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tomate frito bio has 84% fewer calories (80 kcal vs 508 kcal).
  • Tomate frito bio has 85% less fat (4 g vs 27 g).
  • Tomate frito bio has no saturated fat, while Bio Choconoa has 16 g.
  • Tomate frito bio has 81% less sugar (5 g vs 26 g).
  • Bio Choconoa has 50% less salt (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Bio Choconoa has 92% more protein (6.3 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Tomate frito bio has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Bio Choconoa

Not available.

Tomate frito bio

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio Choconoa or Tomate frito bio?

Overall, Tomate frito bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tomate frito bio has fewer calories: 80 kcal versus 508 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tomate frito bio has less sugar: 5 g versus 26 g per 100 g.

More comparisons