Bio Choconoa vs Tomate frito bio
Overall, Tomate frito bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Choconoa | Tomate frito bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 508 kcal | 80 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 26 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 5.3 g | — |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tomate frito bio has 84% fewer calories (80 kcal vs 508 kcal).
- Tomate frito bio has 85% less fat (4 g vs 27 g).
- Tomate frito bio has no saturated fat, while Bio Choconoa has 16 g.
- Tomate frito bio has 81% less sugar (5 g vs 26 g).
- Bio Choconoa has 50% less salt (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Bio Choconoa has 92% more protein (6.3 g vs 0.5 g).
- Tomate frito bio has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bio Choconoa
Not available.
Tomate frito bio
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Choconoa or Tomate frito bio?
Overall, Tomate frito bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tomate frito bio has fewer calories: 80 kcal versus 508 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tomate frito bio has less sugar: 5 g versus 26 g per 100 g.