Beenham Meesterlijck vs Carpaccio
Overall, Beenham Meesterlijck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Beenham Meesterlijck | Carpaccio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 153 kcal | 141 kcal |
| Fat | 6.1 g | 5.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Beenham Meesterlijck has 46% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.3 g).
- Carpaccio has 100% more fiber (0.4 g vs 0 g).
- Beenham Meesterlijck has 21% more protein (24 g vs 19 g).
- Only Carpaccio lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Beenham Meesterlijck
varkensvlees 97%, zout, dextrose, natuurlijk aroma, antioxidant (E301), rookaroma, aroma's, conserveermiddel (E250).
Carpaccio
81,3% carpaccio (95% rundvlees, water, specerijenextract, zout, fruitpoeder (acerola), natuurlijk aroma, groene thee-extract), 8,1% dressing (water, azijn, suiker, plantaardige oliën (raapzaad, olijf), 3% witte wijn, zout, gemodificeerd zetmeel (mais), kruiden, specerijen, gedroogde groenten (ui, knoflook, spinazie), verdikkingsmiddelen: xanthaangom, guarpitmeel), 8,1% kaas (rauwe melk, zout, stremsel), 2,4% geroosterde pijnboompitten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Beenham Meesterlijck or Carpaccio?
Overall, Beenham Meesterlijck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Carpaccio has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 153 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Beenham Meesterlijck has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.