Beenham Meesterlijck vs Fricadon
Overall, Beenham Meesterlijck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Beenham Meesterlijck | Fricadon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 153 kcal | 180 kcal |
| Fat | 6.1 g | 9.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Beenham Meesterlijck has 15% fewer calories (153 kcal vs 180 kcal).
- Beenham Meesterlijck has 38% less fat (6.1 g vs 9.9 g).
- Beenham Meesterlijck has 34% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 3.5 g).
- Beenham Meesterlijck has 26% less salt (2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Beenham Meesterlijck has 17% more protein (24 g vs 20 g).
Ingredients
Beenham Meesterlijck
varkensvlees 97%, zout, dextrose, natuurlijk aroma, antioxidant (E301), rookaroma, aroma's, conserveermiddel (E250).
Fricadon
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Beenham Meesterlijck or Fricadon?
Overall, Beenham Meesterlijck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Beenham Meesterlijck has fewer calories: 153 kcal versus 180 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Beenham Meesterlijck has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.