Comparison

Bebogeen Caramelpasta vs Ch terra HAZEL NOOT pasta

Overall, Bebogeen Caramelpasta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBebogeen CaramelpastaCh terra HAZEL NOOT pasta
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 291 kcal 555 kcal
Fat 1.7 g 35 g
Saturated fat 1 g 5 g
Sugars 58 g 48 g
Salt 0.3 g 3.5 g
Fiber 0 g 3 g
Protein 3.4 g 3.6 g
Additives21
AllergensMilkNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bebogeen Caramelpasta has 48% fewer calories (291 kcal vs 555 kcal).
  • Bebogeen Caramelpasta has 95% less fat (1.7 g vs 35 g).
  • Bebogeen Caramelpasta has 80% less saturated fat (1 g vs 5 g).
  • Ch terra HAZEL NOOT pasta has 17% less sugar (48 g vs 58 g).
  • Bebogeen Caramelpasta has 91% less salt (0.3 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Ch terra HAZEL NOOT pasta has 99% more fiber (3 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Bebogeen Caramelpasta lists: Milk.
  • Only Ch terra HAZEL NOOT pasta lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Bebogeen Caramelpasta

Glucose-fructosestroop, gecondenseerde gedeeltelijk afgeroomde melk met suiker, water, suiker, gemodificeerd maiszetmeel, verdikkingsmiddel (carrageen), kleurstof (karamel), zuurteregelaar (natriumcitraat), zout, aroma,

Ch terra HAZEL NOOT pasta

Suiker, plantaardige olie (raap, zonnebloem), 13% hazelnoot, 7,5% magerecacaopoeder, maltodextrine, cacaoboter, emulgator (E322), natuurlijk vanillearoma.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bebogeen Caramelpasta or Ch terra HAZEL NOOT pasta?

Overall, Bebogeen Caramelpasta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bebogeen Caramelpasta has fewer calories: 291 kcal versus 555 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ch terra HAZEL NOOT pasta has less sugar: 48 g versus 58 g per 100 g.

More comparisons