Balsamico vs Balsamico Azijn
Overall, Balsamico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Balsamico | Balsamico Azijn |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 112 kcal | 116 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 19 g | 29 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Balsamico has 34% less sugar (19 g vs 29 g).
- Balsamico has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Only Balsamico Azijn lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Balsamico
Weinessig (enthält Sulfite), konzentrierter Traubenmost.
Balsamico Azijn
Wijnazijn* (sulfiet), gekookte druivenmost* (sulfiet). Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 milliliter en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.00g per 100 milliliter EU Landbouw *Van biologische oorsprong.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Balsamico or Balsamico Azijn?
Overall, Balsamico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Balsamico has fewer calories: 112 kcal versus 116 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Balsamico has less sugar: 19 g versus 29 g per 100 g.