Comparison
Balsamico vs Balsamico
Overall, Balsamico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Balsamico | Balsamico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 143 kcal | 112 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 28 g | 19 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | — | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Balsamico has 22% fewer calories (112 kcal vs 143 kcal).
- Balsamico has 32% less sugar (19 g vs 28 g).
Ingredients
Balsamico
Not available.
Balsamico
Weinessig (enthält Sulfite), konzentrierter Traubenmost.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Balsamico or Balsamico?
Overall, Balsamico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Balsamico has fewer calories: 112 kcal versus 143 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Balsamico has less sugar: 19 g versus 28 g per 100 g.