Comparison
Balsamico Bianco vs Balsamico
Overall, Balsamico Bianco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Balsamico Bianco | Balsamico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 101 kcal | 143 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 20 g | 28 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.7 g | — |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Balsamico Bianco has 29% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 143 kcal).
- Balsamico Bianco has 29% less sugar (20 g vs 28 g).
Ingredients
Balsamico Bianco
Weißweinessig 75%, Traubenmostkonzentrat 25%, Antioxidationsmittel Kaliummetabisulfit
Balsamico
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Balsamico Bianco or Balsamico?
Overall, Balsamico Bianco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Balsamico Bianco has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 143 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Balsamico Bianco has less sugar: 20 g versus 28 g per 100 g.