Balsamico vs Balsamico Azijn
Overall, Balsamico Azijn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Balsamico | Balsamico Azijn |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 143 kcal | 116 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 28 g | 29 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | — | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Balsamico Azijn has 19% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 143 kcal).
- Only Balsamico Azijn lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Balsamico
Not available.
Balsamico Azijn
Wijnazijn* (sulfiet), gekookte druivenmost* (sulfiet). Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 milliliter en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.00g per 100 milliliter EU Landbouw *Van biologische oorsprong.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Balsamico or Balsamico Azijn?
Overall, Balsamico Azijn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Balsamico Azijn has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 143 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Balsamico has less sugar: 28 g versus 29 g per 100 g.