Baconscheiben vs Unsmoked back bacon rashers
Overall, Unsmoked back bacon rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baconscheiben | Unsmoked back bacon rashers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 303 kcal | 257 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 15.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 5.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 29.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Unsmoked back bacon rashers has 15% fewer calories (257 kcal vs 303 kcal).
- Unsmoked back bacon rashers has 40% less fat (15.1 g vs 25 g).
- Unsmoked back bacon rashers has 45% less saturated fat (5.5 g vs 10 g).
- Baconscheiben has 44% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Baconscheiben has 81% less salt (0.6 g vs 3 g).
- Unsmoked back bacon rashers has 35% more protein (29.4 g vs 19 g).
- Only Unsmoked back bacon rashers lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Baconscheiben
Schweinefleisch*, Speisesalz, Glukosesirup, Gewürzextrakte, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Reifungskulturen, Buchenholzrauch. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.
Unsmoked back bacon rashers
pork (87%), water, salt, natural flavoring, antioxidant: ascorbic acid,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baconscheiben or Unsmoked back bacon rashers?
Overall, Unsmoked back bacon rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Unsmoked back bacon rashers has fewer calories: 257 kcal versus 303 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baconscheiben has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1 g per 100 g.