Comparison
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO vs Filet de saxe bio
Overall, Filet de saxe bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO | Filet de saxe bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 110 kcal | 121 kcal |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 18.9 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de saxe bio has 53% less fat (1.8 g vs 3.8 g).
- Filet de saxe bio has 75% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.2 g).
- Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO has 33% less salt (2 g vs 3 g).
- Filet de saxe bio has 24% more protein (25 g vs 18.9 g).
Ingredients
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO
Not available.
Filet de saxe bio
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO or Filet de saxe bio?
Overall, Filet de saxe bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 121 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de Saxe
Filet de Saxe vs Filet de saxe bio
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet De Saxe
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de saxe
Filet de saxe bio vs Filet De Saxe
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de saxe
Filet de saxe bio vs Filet de saxe
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de Saxe