Comparison
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO vs Filet de Saxe
Overall, Filet de Saxe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO | Filet de Saxe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 110 kcal | 96 kcal |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 18.9 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de Saxe has 13% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 110 kcal).
- Filet de Saxe has 53% less fat (1.8 g vs 3.8 g).
- Filet de Saxe has 42% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Filet de Saxe has no sugar, while Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO has 0.5 g.
- Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO has 39% less salt (2 g vs 3.3 g).
Ingredients
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO
Not available.
Filet de Saxe
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO or Filet de Saxe?
Overall, Filet de Saxe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de Saxe has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 110 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de Saxe has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de Saxe
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de saxe bio
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet De Saxe
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de saxe
Filet de Saxe vs Filet de saxe
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de saxe
Filet de Saxe vs Filet de Saxe
Filet de Saxe vs Filet de Saxe