Comparison
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO vs Filet de saxe
Overall, Filet de saxe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO | Filet de saxe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 110 kcal | 96 kcal |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 3.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 18.9 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de saxe has 13% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 110 kcal).
- Filet de saxe has 53% less fat (1.8 g vs 3.8 g).
- Filet de saxe has 42% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Filet de saxe has no sugar, while Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO has 0.5 g.
- Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO has 39% less salt (2 g vs 3.3 g).
Ingredients
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO
Not available.
Filet de saxe
96,8 % viande de porc, sel, conservateur (E250).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO or Filet de saxe?
Overall, Filet de saxe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de saxe has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 110 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de saxe has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de Saxe
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de saxe bio
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet De Saxe
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de saxe
Filet de Saxe vs Filet de saxe
Filet de Saxe vs Filet de saxe
Filet de Saxe vs Filet de saxe
Filet de saxe bio vs Filet de saxe