Comparison

Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO vs Filet de saxe

Overall, Filet de saxe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO	Filet de saxe
Nutri-Score	d	d
NOVA group	—	—
Calories	110 kcal	108 kcal
Fat	3.8 g	2 g
Saturated fat	1.2 g	0.8 g
Sugars	0.5 g	0.4 g
Salt	2 g	3 g
Protein	18.9 g	22 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Filet de saxe has 47% less fat (2 g vs 3.8 g).
Filet de saxe has 33% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO has 33% less salt (2 g vs 3 g).
Filet de saxe has 14% more protein (22 g vs 18.9 g).

Ingredients

Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO

Not available.

Filet de saxe

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bacon - Filet de Saxe BIO or Filet de saxe?

Overall, Filet de saxe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de saxe has fewer calories: 108 kcal versus 110 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de saxe has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Filet de Saxe vs Filet de saxe Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de Saxe Filet de Saxe vs Filet de saxe Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de saxe bio Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet De Saxe Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de saxe Filet de saxe vs Filet de saxe Bacon - Filet de Saxe BI... vs Filet de Saxe