Comparison
Filet de Saxe vs Filet de saxe
Overall, Filet de saxe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de Saxe | Filet de saxe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 110 kcal | 96 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.4 g | 3.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de saxe has 13% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 110 kcal).
- Filet de Saxe has 17% less fat (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Filet de saxe has no sugar, while Filet de Saxe has 0.9 g.
Ingredients
Filet de Saxe
Not available.
Filet de saxe
96,8 % viande de porc, sel, conservateur (E250).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de Saxe or Filet de saxe?
Overall, Filet de saxe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de saxe has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 110 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de saxe has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.