Comparison
Filet de saxe bio vs Filet De Saxe
Overall, Filet De Saxe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de saxe bio | Filet De Saxe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 121 kcal | 114 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 3.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet De Saxe has 22% less fat (1.4 g vs 1.8 g).
- Filet De Saxe has 75% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Filet de saxe bio has 14% less salt (3 g vs 3.5 g).
Ingredients
Filet de saxe bio
Not available.
Filet De Saxe
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de saxe bio or Filet De Saxe?
Overall, Filet De Saxe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet De Saxe has fewer calories: 114 kcal versus 121 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet De Saxe has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.