Comparison
Filet de saxe bio vs Filet de Saxe
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de saxe bio | Filet de Saxe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 121 kcal | 96 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de Saxe has 21% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 121 kcal).
- Filet de saxe bio has 57% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Filet de Saxe has no sugar, while Filet de saxe bio has 0.8 g.
- Filet de saxe bio has 20% more protein (25 g vs 20 g).
Ingredients
Filet de saxe bio
Not available.
Filet de Saxe
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de saxe bio or Filet de Saxe?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de Saxe has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 121 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de Saxe has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.