Comparison
Filet De Saxe vs Filet de Saxe
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet De Saxe | Filet de Saxe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 114 kcal | 116 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.5 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | — |
| Protein | 25 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet De Saxe has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Filet de Saxe has 23% less salt (2.7 g vs 3.5 g).
Ingredients
Filet De Saxe
Not available.
Filet de Saxe
97 4 % viande de porc. sel, conservateur E250)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet De Saxe or Filet de Saxe?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet De Saxe has fewer calories: 114 kcal versus 116 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet De Saxe has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.