Comparison

Back-Mozarella-Sticks mit Tomatensauce vs Mozza stick

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBack-Mozarella-Sticks mit To...Mozza stick
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 261 kcal 293 kcal
Fat 14 g 12.8 g
Saturated fat 6.2 g 5.3 g
Sugars 3.8 g 11.7 g
Salt 1.4 g 1.2 g
Fiber — 1.5 g
Protein 12 g 11.2 g
Additives40
AllergensGluten, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Back-Mozarella-Sticks mit Tomatensauce has 11% fewer calories (261 kcal vs 293 kcal).
  • Mozza stick has 15% less saturated fat (5.3 g vs 6.2 g).
  • Back-Mozarella-Sticks mit Tomatensauce has 68% less sugar (3.8 g vs 11.7 g).
  • Mozza stick is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Back-Mozarella-Sticks mit Tomatensauce lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Back-Mozarella-Sticks mit Tomatensauce

Back-Mozzarella-Sticks: 52% Mozzarella; Mehl (Weizen, Roggen); Wasser; pflanzliche Öle (Raps, Sonnenblume in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen); Weizenstärke; Salz; Gluten (Weizen); Gewürze; Verdickungsmittel: Methylcellulose; Milcheiweiß; Kräuter; Tomatenpulver; Zucker. Tomatensauce: Wasser; 12% Tomaten; Zucker; Weißweinessig; 6% Tomatenmark; modifizierte Stärke; jodhaltiges Salz (Salz, Kaliumjodat); Gewürze; Zwiebeln; Paprika; Zitronensaftkonzentrat; Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl, Xanthan; Kräuter.

Mozza stick

nutri-score d

FAQ

Which is healthier: Back-Mozarella-Sticks mit Tomatensauce or Mozza stick?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Back-Mozarella-Sticks mit Tomatensauce has fewer calories: 261 kcal versus 293 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Back-Mozarella-Sticks mit Tomatensauce has less sugar: 3.8 g versus 11.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons