Comparison
Avellana cruda vs Fruits secs
Overall, Avellana cruda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Avellana cruda | Fruits secs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 683 kcal | 678 kcal |
| Fat | 63 g | 60.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.2 g | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19.3 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruits secs has 14% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 5.2 g).
- Avellana cruda has 33% less sugar (3.3 g vs 4.9 g).
- Avellana cruda has 22% more protein (19.3 g vs 15 g).
- Avellana cruda has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Avellana cruda
Not available.
Fruits secs
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Avellana cruda or Fruits secs?
Overall, Avellana cruda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruits secs has fewer calories: 678 kcal versus 683 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Avellana cruda has less sugar: 3.3 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.