Comparison
Fruits secs vs Avellana cruda
Overall, Avellana cruda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fruits secs | Avellana cruda |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 678 kcal | 622 kcal |
| Fat | 60.7 g | 56.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.5 g | 4.8 g |
| Sugars | 4.9 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 11.6 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 14.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Avellana cruda has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Avellana cruda lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Fruits secs
Not available.
Avellana cruda
_Avellana_ cruda.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruits secs or Avellana cruda?
Overall, Avellana cruda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Avellana cruda has fewer calories: 622 kcal versus 678 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fruits secs has less sugar: 4.9 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.