Comparison
Asta vs Nescafé classic natural
Overall, Nescafé classic natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Asta | Nescafé classic natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 101 kcal | 2 kcal |
| Fat | 9 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nescafé classic natural has 98% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 101 kcal).
- Nescafé classic natural has no fat, while Asta has 9 g.
- Nescafé classic natural has no saturated fat, while Asta has 4 g.
- Nescafé classic natural has 96% less sugar (0.1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Asta has 77% more fiber (3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Asta has 90% more protein (2 g vs 0.2 g).
Ingredients
Asta
r•ee z=CagStzaca - TéL: OS 22 621212
Nescafé classic natural
Café soluble.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Asta or Nescafé classic natural?
Overall, Nescafé classic natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nescafé classic natural has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 101 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nescafé classic natural has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Ricoré Original vs Asta
Ricoré Original vs Nescafé classic natural
Special filtre vs Asta
Special filtre vs Nescafé classic natural
Cappuccino soluble vs Nescafé classic natural
Nescafé classic natural vs Löslichen Kaffee
Thé Latté Saveur Vanille... vs Nescafé classic natural
NESCAFÉ NES, Café Solubl... vs Asta