Ricoré Original vs Nescafé classic natural
Overall, Nescafé classic natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricoré Original | Nescafé classic natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 52 kcal | 2 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 9.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 45.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nescafé classic natural has 96% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 52 kcal).
- Nescafé classic natural has no fat, while Ricoré Original has 0.5 g.
- Nescafé classic natural has 99% less sugar (0.1 g vs 9.1 g).
- Ricoré Original has 98% more fiber (45.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Ricoré Original has 93% more protein (2.7 g vs 0.2 g).
- Nescafé classic natural is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Ricoré Original
café soluble 33,2%, fibres de chicorée (oligofructose) 33%, chicorée soluble 30%, sulfate de magnésium.
Nescafé classic natural
Café soluble.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricoré Original or Nescafé classic natural?
Overall, Nescafé classic natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nescafé classic natural has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nescafé classic natural has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 9.1 g per 100 g.