Ricoré Original vs Asta
Overall, Ricoré Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricoré Original | Asta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 52 kcal | 101 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 9.1 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | — |
| Fiber | 45.3 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricoré Original has 49% fewer calories (52 kcal vs 101 kcal).
- Ricoré Original has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 9 g).
- Ricoré Original has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 4 g).
- Asta has 70% less sugar (2.7 g vs 9.1 g).
- Ricoré Original has 93% more fiber (45.3 g vs 3 g).
- Ricoré Original has 26% more protein (2.7 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Ricoré Original
café soluble 33,2%, fibres de chicorée (oligofructose) 33%, chicorée soluble 30%, sulfate de magnésium.
Asta
r•ee z=CagStzaca - TéL: OS 22 621212
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricoré Original or Asta?
Overall, Ricoré Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricoré Original has fewer calories: 52 kcal versus 101 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Asta has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 9.1 g per 100 g.