Comparison
Special filtre vs Nescafé classic natural
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Special filtre | Nescafé classic natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 2 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 34.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nescafé classic natural has 96% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 45 kcal).
- Nescafé classic natural has 97% less sugar (0.1 g vs 3.1 g).
- Special filtre has 98% more fiber (34.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Special filtre has 97% more protein (7.8 g vs 0.2 g).
Ingredients
Special filtre
Café.
Nescafé classic natural
Café soluble.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Special filtre or Nescafé classic natural?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nescafé classic natural has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nescafé classic natural has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Ricoré Original vs Special filtre
Ricoré Original vs Nescafé classic natural
Special filtre vs NESCAFÉ NES, Café Solubl...
Special filtre vs Cappuccino soluble
Special filtre vs Löslichen Kaffee
Special filtre vs Thé Latté Saveur Vanille...
Cappuccino soluble vs Nescafé classic natural
Nescafé classic natural vs Löslichen Kaffee