Comparison

Thé Latté Saveur Vanille Caramel vs Nescafé classic natural

Overall, Nescafé classic natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientThé Latté Saveur Vanille Car...Nescafé classic natural
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 397 kcal 2 kcal
Fat 5.6 g 0 g
Saturated fat 4.7 g 0 g
Sugars 73 g 0.1 g
Salt 1.8 g 0 g
Fiber — 0.7 g
Protein 4.4 g 0.2 g
Additives20
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Nescafé classic natural has 99% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 397 kcal).
  • Nescafé classic natural has no fat, while Thé Latté Saveur Vanille Caramel has 5.6 g.
  • Nescafé classic natural has no saturated fat, while Thé Latté Saveur Vanille Caramel has 4.7 g.
  • Nescafé classic natural has 100% less sugar (0.1 g vs 73 g).
  • Nescafé classic natural has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Thé Latté Saveur Vanille Caramel has 95% more protein (4.4 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Nescafé classic natural is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Thé Latté Saveur Vanille Caramel lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Thé Latté Saveur Vanille Caramel

Sucre, poudre de sérum de lait, sirop de glucose, poudre de lait écrémé, huile de noix d²e coco, extrait de thé noir (4%), poudre de lait entier, sel, arôme naturel, extrait de vanille (0,5%), stabilisant (E340), émulsifiant (E472e)

Nescafé classic natural

Café soluble.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Thé Latté Saveur Vanille Caramel or Nescafé classic natural?

Overall, Nescafé classic natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Nescafé classic natural has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 397 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Nescafé classic natural has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 73 g per 100 g.

More comparisons