Anacardo Tostado Sal vs Lays Butler Naturel
Overall, Anacardo Tostado Sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Anacardo Tostado Sal | Lays Butler Naturel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 621 kcal | 519 kcal |
| Fat | 50.2 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.3 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 5.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 5.3 g |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 5.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lays Butler Naturel has 16% fewer calories (519 kcal vs 621 kcal).
- Lays Butler Naturel has 38% less fat (31 g vs 50.2 g).
- Lays Butler Naturel has 68% less saturated fat (3 g vs 9.3 g).
- Lays Butler Naturel has 37% less sugar (3.5 g vs 5.6 g).
- Anacardo Tostado Sal has no salt, while Lays Butler Naturel has 5.3 g.
- Anacardo Tostado Sal has 82% more fiber (3.8 g vs 0.7 g).
- Anacardo Tostado Sal has 71% more protein (18.6 g vs 5.4 g).
- Anacardo Tostado Sal has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Lays Butler Naturel lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Anacardo Tostado Sal
Not available.
Lays Butler Naturel
Maismehl, Sonnenblumenöl, herzhafte Aromazubereitung [natürliches Aroma (enthält schwarzen Pfeffer), Zwiebelpulver, Säureregulatoren (Citronensäure, Natriumacetate), Knoblauchpulver, Farbstoff (Paprikaextrakt)], Salz, Zucker, Kann Soja und Weizen (Gluten enthalten,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Anacardo Tostado Sal or Lays Butler Naturel?
Overall, Anacardo Tostado Sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lays Butler Naturel has fewer calories: 519 kcal versus 621 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lays Butler Naturel has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 5.6 g per 100 g.