Comparison

Amandes en poudre vs Poudre d’amande bio

Overall, Amandes en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAmandes en poudrePoudre d’amande bio
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 639 kcal 679 kcal
Fat 55.3 g 61 g
Saturated fat 4.4 g 5 g
Sugars 4.3 g 5.7 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 10 g 7.6 g
Protein 25.2 g 22.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Amandes en poudre has 12% less saturated fat (4.4 g vs 5 g).
  • Amandes en poudre has 25% less sugar (4.3 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Amandes en poudre has 24% more fiber (10 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Only Amandes en poudre lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Amandes en poudre

amandes. Origine : USA Traces d'arachide, d'autres fruits à coque, de graines de sésame, de céréales contenant du gluten, dlanhydride sulfureux et de soja.

Poudre d’amande bio

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Amandes en poudre or Poudre d’amande bio?

Overall, Amandes en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Amandes en poudre has fewer calories: 639 kcal versus 679 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Amandes en poudre has less sugar: 4.3 g versus 5.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons