Amandes décortiquées vs Mandeln
Overall, Mandeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amandes décortiquées | Mandeln |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 625 kcal | 619 kcal |
| Fat | 54 g | 53 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.9 g | 4.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 12 g | 11.2 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mandeln has 16% less saturated fat (4.1 g vs 4.9 g).
Ingredients
Amandes décortiquées
_Amandes_ décortiquées biologiques. Peut contenir des traces d'arachides, autres fruits à coque, graines de sésame, céréales contenant du gluten, sulfites et soja.
Mandeln
Amandes décortiquées
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amandes décortiquées or Mandeln?
Overall, Mandeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mandeln has fewer calories: 619 kcal versus 625 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mandeln has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.