Comparison
Mandeln vs Amandes
Overall, Mandeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mandeln | Amandes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 619 kcal | 610 kcal |
| Fat | 53 g | 51.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.1 g | 4.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 3.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 11.2 g | 9.9 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 25.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mandeln has 13% less sugar (3.4 g vs 3.9 g).
- Mandeln has 12% more fiber (11.2 g vs 9.9 g).
Ingredients
Mandeln
Amandes décortiquées
Amandes
100% amandes
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mandeln or Amandes?
Overall, Mandeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amandes has fewer calories: 610 kcal versus 619 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mandeln has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.