Comparison
Amandes vs Amandes
Overall, Amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amandes | Amandes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 633 kcal | 619 kcal |
| Fat | 58 g | 53 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9.8 g | 9.9 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amandes has 31% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 6.5 g).
- Amandes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Amandes
AMANDES, huile de tournesol.
Amandes
100 % _amandes_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amandes or Amandes?
Overall, Amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amandes has fewer calories: 619 kcal versus 633 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amandes has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.