Comparison
Alubia Pinta vs Alubia pinta
Overall, Alubia Pinta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Alubia Pinta | Alubia pinta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 349 kcal | 93 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 25.4 g | — |
| Protein | 19 g | 6.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Alubia pinta has 73% fewer calories (93 kcal vs 349 kcal).
- Alubia pinta has 71% less fat (0.4 g vs 1.4 g).
- Alubia pinta has 59% less sugar (0.9 g vs 2.2 g).
- Alubia Pinta has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
- Alubia Pinta has 67% more protein (19 g vs 6.2 g).
- Alubia Pinta has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Alubia Pinta
Not available.
Alubia pinta
Alubias pintas, agua, sal, antioxidante (E-385).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Alubia Pinta or Alubia pinta?
Overall, Alubia Pinta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alubia pinta has fewer calories: 93 kcal versus 349 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alubia pinta has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.