Ranch Style Beans vs Alubia pinta
Overall, Alubia pinta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ranch Style Beans | Alubia pinta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 115 kcal | 93 kcal |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 5.3 g | — |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 6.2 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Alubia pinta has 19% fewer calories (93 kcal vs 115 kcal).
- Alubia pinta has 85% less fat (0.4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Alubia pinta has 41% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.5 g).
- Alubia pinta has 14% more protein (6.2 g vs 5.3 g).
- Ranch Style Beans has the better Nutri-Score.
- Alubia pinta is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Ranch Style Beans lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Ranch Style Beans
PREPARED PINTO BEANS (WATER, PINTO BEANS), WATER, TOMATO PUREE (WATER, TOMATO PASTE), LESS THAN 2% OF: CANOLA OIL, SALT, SUGAR, SPICES, HYDROXYLATED SOY LECITHIN, ONION POWDER, DISTILLED VINEGAR, GARLIC POWDER, OLEORESIN PAPRIKA, NATURAL FLAVOR. CONTAINS: SOY.
Alubia pinta
Alubias pintas, agua, sal, antioxidante (E-385).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ranch Style Beans or Alubia pinta?
Overall, Alubia pinta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alubia pinta has fewer calories: 93 kcal versus 115 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alubia pinta has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.