Comparison
Adzukibönor vs Adukibonen
Overall, Adzukibönor has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Adzukibönor | Adukibonen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 295 kcal | 329 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 23 g | 12.7 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 19.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Adzukibönor has 10% fewer calories (295 kcal vs 329 kcal).
- Adukibonen has 64% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Adzukibönor has 45% more fiber (23 g vs 12.7 g).
Ingredients
Adzukibönor
Torkade adzukibönor
Adukibonen
biologische adukibonen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Adzukibönor or Adukibonen?
Overall, Adzukibönor has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Adzukibönor has fewer calories: 295 kcal versus 329 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Adzukibönor has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.